Table of Contents

Effects of Community Environment on Juvenile Crime Rates

Criminal youth tend to live in high-crime neighborhoods. Each reinforces the other in a destructive relationship, spiraling downward into violence and social chaos.

1. Single-Parent Neighborhoods

Single-parent neighborhoods tend to be high-crime neighborhoods. Researchers long ago observed that violent crime, among both teenagers and adults, is concentrated most heavily in urban neighborhoods characterized by a very high proportion of single- parent families,1) and this remains true today.2) Even homicide rates are higher in counties with more single-parent families.3) On the contrary, neighborhoods with more fathers report fewer crimes.4) More recent figures indicate the nonmarital birth rate in many urban neighborhoods is a staggering 80 percent. And today's researchers, like those before them, find that a neighborhood composed mainly of single-parent families invariably is a chaotic, crime-ridden community5) in which assaults are high6) and the gang – “ the delinquent sub-community”– assumes control.7) In these chaotic conditions, parental supervision of adolescent and pre-adolescent children is almost impossible.8) In turn, children living in these neighborhoods are more likely to learn, accept, and use physical violence to satisfy their wants and needs.9)

While serious crime is highest in these socially disorganized, largely urban neighborhoods, its frequency is not a function of race; rather, the determining factor is the absence of marriage. Among broken families, with their chaotic, “dysfunctional” relationships, whether white or black, the crime rate is very high. Among married two-parent families, whether white or black, the crime rate is very low. The capacity and determination to maintain stable married relationships, not race, is the pivotal factor.10) The chaotic, broken community stems from these chaotic, broken families. The reason race appears to be an important factor in crime is the wide differences in marriage rates among ethnic groups.

While the crime rate among blacks has risen sharply, so has the disappearance of marriage. The same holds true for whites. A recent report from the state of Wisconsin further illustrates the same relationship. A high concentration of broken families without husbands and fathers is the danger signal for future crime.

2. Violent Families in Violent Neighborhoods

According to the National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence, in 2011 twenty-two percent of children had witnessed violence in their homes, schools, and communities in the past year, and one in twelve children saw one family member assault another in the past year.11) Children exposed to family violence are also the most likely to commit serious violent crime and to become “versatile” criminals – those engaged in a variety of crimes, including, theft, fraud, and drugs.12) Among these youths, victims of violent crime are more likely to be perpetrators of violent crimes.13) Physically or sexually abused boys commit the most violent offenses.14)

Internal family violence is only one major contributor to adolescent violence in these socially disorganized neighborhoods. The neighborhood itself (which includes the youth's violent peers, also rooted in their own broken families) is the other powerful contributor,15) especially to violent delinquency.16) This culture of aggression and violence is imported into the school. Consider these facts from the Centers for Disease Control:17)

Children exposed to violence are much more likely to experience physical, mental, and emotional problems as a result.22) Given the level of violence in their neighborhoods, for young people to carry guns for self-defense is perhaps understandable.23) And the youth most likely to feel the need for defense is the member of a street gang in a violent neighborhood. After the adolescent has committed his first violent crime, the evidence shows that he is likely to commit further crimes and more than twice as likely as other criminal youths to commit more violence.24)

3. Gang Involvement

Commenting on the work of all parents as their children enter adolescence, Travis Hirschi of the University of Arizona writes:

Affection and monitoring had better have done the job already, because the “child-rearing” days are over. It is time to hope for the best…. [A] major feature of recent times is the increasing independence of adolescents from the family…. This independence from the family results in increasing dependence of the adolescent on other adolescents. But adolescents cannot take the place of parents as socializing agents because they have little or no investment in the outcome, and are less likely to recognize deviant behavior.25)

All children, especially during their teenage years, gravitate toward the influence of their peers.26) As the professional literature shows, delinquent peers move a boy in the direction of delinquency and crime.27) The same is true for girls.

In the company of their peers, future criminals gradually learn to exploit the people of their own community, a community to which they feel no responsibility or obligation.28) For these boys, increasingly involved with delinquent companions, their lives tend to become insulated from the weakening influence of their families. Continued weakness in parental supervision, monitoring, and control invariably escalates the conflict at home, and this increasing conflict and related family problems cause these children to deepen their affiliation with delinquent groups, the only class of people likely to welcome them “with a place to belong to.” While the children continue their aggressive, hostile, and violent ways, their behavior also increasingly repels normal, non-aggressive people. They grow more familiar and at ease with their delinquent peers.29) Thus, dropping out of school is a natural development.30) Gang membership also tends to attract youth from non-intact families.31)

1) National Center for Health Statistics, “Vital Statistics of the United States 1990,” Natality 1, (1994): 194-236. Tables 185 and 186.
2) Chris Knnoester and Dana L. Haynie, “Community Context, Social Integration into Family, and Youth Violence,” Journal of Marriage and Family 67, no 3. (2005): 767-780.
3) Jennifer Schwartz, “Effects of Diverse Forms of Family Structure on Female and Male Homicide,” Journal of Marriage and Family 68, no. 5 (2006): pp. 1291-1312.
4) C. Knoester, & D.A. Hayne, “Community Context, Social Integration Into Family, and Youth Violence,” Journal of Marriage and Family 67, (2005): 767-780.
5) Douglas Smith and G. Roger Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25, no. 1 (1988): 27-52; Hill and O’Neill, Underclass Behaviors in the United States: Measurements and Analysis of Determinants.
6) Robert B. Sylvies et al., “Medical, Family, and Scholastic Conditions in Urban Delinquents,” Journal of Clinical Psychology 47, no. 3 (1991): 448-449.
7) Jeffrey Fagan and Sandra Wexler, “Family Origins of Violent Delinquents,” Criminology 25, no. 3 (1987): 643-669.
8) A.J. Reis, Jr. “Why Are Communities Important in Understanding Crime?” Communities and Crime (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1986), 1-33.
9) Elton Jackson, Charles Tittle, and M.J. Burke, “Offense-Specific Models of Differential Association,” paper presented at annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, (1984) cited in Fagan and Wexler, “Family Origins of Violent Delinquents”; Rodney Stark, “Deviant Places: A Theory of the Ecology of Crime,” Criminology 25, (1987): 893-909.
10) Sampson, “Urban Black Violence: The Effect of Male Joblessness and Family Disruption”; Fagan, “Rising Illegitimacy: America’s Social Catastrophe”; Smith and Jarjoura, “Social Structure and Criminal Victimization.”
11) Child Trends, “Children's exposure to violence” (2013). Available at http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=childrens-exposure-to-violence.
12) G. Margolin, & B. G. Elana, “Children's Exposure to Violence in The Family and Community,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 13, no. 4 (2004): 152-155.
D. Finkelhor, H. A. Turner, R. Ormrod, S. Hamby, & K. Kracke, “Children’s Exposure to Violence: A Comprehensive National Survey,” U.S. Department of Justice (2009). Available at http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/227744.pdf.
13) Madeline Wordes and Michell Nunez, “Out Vulnerable Teenagers: Their Victimization, Its Consequences, and Directions for Prevention and Intervention,” National Council on Crime and Delinquency (2002).
US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Short and Long-Term Consequences of Adolescent Victimization, Scott W. Menard, (2002).
14) Cathy Spatz Widom, “Child Abuse, Neglect, and Violent Criminal Behavior,” Criminology 27, no. 2 (1989): 251-271.
Dorothy Lewis et al. “Toward a Theory of the Genesis of Violence: A Follow-up Study of Delinquents,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 28, no. 3 (1989): 431-436.
Jeffrey Fagan and Sandra Wexler “Family Origins of Violent Delinquents,” Criminology 25, no. 3 (1987): 643-670.
Lisabeth Fisher DiLalla, Christina M. Mitchell, Michael W. Arthur, and Pauline M. Pagliocca, “Aggression and Delinquency: Family and Environmental Factors,” Journal of youth and adolescence 17, no. 3 (1988): 233-246.
15) Patrick F. Fagan, “The Real Root Causes of Violent Crime: The Breakdown of Marriage, Family, and Community,” The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder #1026 on Crime. Available at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1995/03/bg1026nbsp-the-real-root-causes-of-violent-crime
Chris Knnoester and Dana L. Haynie, “Community Context, Social Integration into Family, and Youth Violence,” Journal of Marriage and Family 67, no 3. (2005): 767-780.
16) D. Wayne Osgood and Jeff M. Chambers, “Social Disorganization Outside the Metropolis: An Analysis of Rural Youth Violence,” Criminology 38, no. 1 (2000): 81-115.
Delbert S. Elliott, David Huizinga, and Barbara J. Morse, “The Dynamics of Deviant Behavior: A National Survey Progress Report,” (1985).
17) “Youth Violence: Facts at a Glance,” Center of Disease Control (2012) available at http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/YV-DataSheet-a.pdf (accessed August 20, 2015).
18) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2011,” MMWR, Surveillance Summaries 61, no. SS-4 (2012). Available from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6104.pdf.
19) , 20) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2011,” MMWR, Surveillance Summaries 61, no. SS-4 (2012). Available from ss6104.pdf.
21) National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice Indicators of School Crime and Safety, 2011 Robers S, Zhang J, Truman J, Synder TD, (Washington, DC; 2010). Available from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012002.pdf.
22) Gayla Margolin and Elana B. Gordis, “Children’s Exposure to Violence in The Family and Community,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 13, (2004): 152-155.
David Finkelhor, Richard Ormrod, Heather Turner, and Sherry L. Hamby, “The Victimization of Children and Youth: A Comprehensive, National Survey,” Child Maltreatment 10, (2005): 5-25.
Naomi Duke, Sandra L. Pettingell, Barbara McMorris, and Iris W. Borowky, “Adolescent Violence Perpetration: Association with Multiple Types of Adverse Childhood Experiences,” Pediatrics 125, (2010): e778-e786.
23) Alan J. Lizotte, James M. Tesoriero, Terence P. Thornberry, and Marvin D. Krohn, “Patterns of Adolescent Firearms Ownership and Use,” Justice Quarterly 11, (1994): 51-74.
24) Patricia Brennan, Sarnoff Mednick, and Richard John, “Specialization in Violence: Evidence of a Criminal Subgroup,” Criminology 27, no. 3 (1989): 437-453.
Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, “Persistence and Desistence in Offending,” (unpublished report, Pittsburgh, Pa: Life History Research Program, University of Pittsburgh, 2010). As cited by the National Institute of Justice, “From Juvenile Delinquency to Young Adult Offending.” Available at http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/Pages/delinquency-to-adult-offending.aspx#note5.
25) James Q. Wilson, Crime and Public Policy (Oxford University Press: 2010), 53-68.
26) Raymond Paternoster, “Examining Three Wave Deterrence Models: A Question of Temporal Order and Specification,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 79, (1988): 135-179.
27) LeGrande Gardner and Donald J. Shoemaker, “Social Bonding and Delinquency: A Comparative Analysis,” Sociological Quarterly (1989): 481-499.
Gerald R. Patterson and Thomas J. Dishion, “Contributions of Families and Peers to Delinquency,” Criminology 23, no. 1 (1985): 63-79.
Ronald L. Simons and Joan F. Robertson, “The Impact of Parenting Factors, Deviant Peers and Coping Style Upon Adolescent Drug Use,” Family Relations (1989): 273-281.
Cindy L. Hanson, Scott W. Henggeler, William F. Haefele, and J. Douglas Rodick, “The Demographic, Individual and Family Relationship Correlates of Serious and Repeated Crime Among Adolescents and Their Siblings,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52, no. 4 (1984).
R.L. Matsueda and Karen Heimer, “Race, Family Structure and Delinquency: A Test of Differential Association and Social Control Theories,” American Sociological Review 52, (1988): 826-840.
28) D.S. Elliott, D. Huizinga, and B.J. Morse, The Dynamics of Deviant Behavior: A National Survey Progress Report (Boulder Col.: Behavioral Research Institute, 1985).
29) Gerald R. Patterson and Thomas J. Dishion, “Contributions of Families and Peers to Delinquency,” Criminology 23, no. 1 (1985): 63-79.
Lisabeth Fisher DiLalla, Christian M. Mitchell, Michael W. Arthur, and Pauline M. Pagliocca, “Aggression and Delinquency: Family and Environmental Factors,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 17, no. 3 (1988): 233-246.
Ronald L. Simons and Joan F. Robertson, “The Impact of Parenting Factors, Deviant Peers and Coping Style Upon Adolescent Drug Use,” Family Relations (1989): 273-281.
30) Jeffrey Fagan and Edward Pabon, “Contributions of Delinquency and Substance Use to School Dropout Among Inner-City Youths,” Youth and Society 21, no. 3 (1990): 306-54.
31) Bill Muehlenberg, “The Case for Two-Parent Family Part II”, National Observer (2002): 49-58.


This entry draws heavily from The Real Root Causes of Violent Crime: The Breakdown of Marriage, Family, and Community.